We were asked to view the same message three different ways:
an email, a voicemail, and in person. Here are the thoughts I had after viewing
each message:
Email: Message
seemed pretty clear that Jane needed Mark’s report in order to complete her
portion of the project by the deadline. Did not really seem like she was
frustrated at this point, just sounded like a reminder to him even though she
knows he is busy. She did state that she knew he had meetings all day, and that
if he did not have the report done that if he could let her know when he would
have it or if he could at least send the data if it was not done. Overall I
thought it was a friendly reminder to Mark that Jane wasn’t trying to be pushy
but really needed his information.
Voice mail: The exact same message was conveyed about
what Jane needed. The tone in her voice was light and friendly, there seemed to
be no sign of anger or frustration. She was just stating the facts that she
understands he is busy but she has her own deadline to meet and needs his
information to do so. As I sat after hearing the message I did not feel she was
being pushy or rude.
In Person: Jane
walked over to Mark’s cubicle and again the content of the message was the
same. There was no doubt this time that she was being friendly and
understanding as you could see her relaxed posture, and also hear the tone in
her voice. She just needed his information as soon as he could get it to her.
After viewing the exact same message three different ways it
really shows you how different methods of communication can bring across the
exact same message in different ways.
Although in the end it seems like I had the same understanding of what
Jane was saying, after each example my confidence in what I was getting from
Jane increased. I was pretty sure after reading the email she wasn’t mad, even
more sure after hearing her voice, and positive after seeing her in person. This is a great example to show us that even
though technology is awesome, and it makes things easier, it is not always the
best way to communicate. If your only communication to your teammates is
through email you are leaving the door open to miscommunication about the
underlying feelings behind a message. To you it may seem simple and straight
forward because you are busy and just jotting down what you need to know from
the person, but to them it could come off that you are mad at them or even that
you don’t necessarily see them as a person, just as someone who needs to get
something done for you. The best way to communicate important information is
always going to be in person. That way they can read your body language and
hear your voice and will know exactly what is being asked of them without
having to try to figure out if you are
angry or not. As a PM you can also read
the facial expressions, tone, and body language of your team member to make
sure they understand, or see if they are stressed and/or confused about the
project.
As we continue to read, communication is so important when
it comes to the success of a project. “The
key to successful project management is effective communication- sharing the
right messages with the right people in a timely manner.” (Portny et al, 2008,
pg.357). Even though it is much faster to shoot someone an email, or leave them
a voicemail (which is better than an email), the most effective way to
communicate is going to be in person. This way you are also forming a better
relationship with your team members which will only make a positive impact on
your project. In the end it is going to be more beneficial to see that person
face to face, even using technology this is an option today.
Resources
Portny, S. E.,
Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B.
E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling
projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment